logo

Make Your Career Soar

Forty eight-years ago this month, the North American X-15 hit a speed of 3,590 mph (Mach 5.23) in a flight to 103,300 feet.  While decelerating through Mach 4.2, the nose gear of the aircraft unexpectedly deployed in flight.

The 114th powered flight of the legendary X-15 Program took place on Friday, 14 August 1964.  USAF Major Robert A. Rushworth was at the controls of X-15 Ship No. 2 (S/N 56-6671).  The mission would be Rushworth’s 22nd flight in the black hypersonic aircraft.

X-15 drop from the NB-52A (S/N 52-0003) launch aircraft took place over Delamar Dry Lake, Nevada.  Seconds later, Rushworth called for 100% power from the X-15’s XLR-99 liquid-fueled rocket engine as he pulled into a steep climb.  He subsequently pushed-over and then leveled-off at 103,300 feet.

XLR-99 burnout occurred 80.3 seconds after ignition.  At this juncture, the X-15 was traveling at 3,590 mph; better than 5 times the speed of sound.  Following burnout, the aircraft slowed and began to lose altitude under the influence of aerodynamic drag.

As the Mach meter needle passed through Mach 4.2, Rushworth heard a loud bang from the airframe.  The aircraft became hard to control as it gyrated in pitch, yaw and roll.  Rushworth was equal to the moment and brought his troubled steed under control.  However, the aircraft had an uncommanded sideslip and Rushworth had to use left aileron to hold the wings level.

Gathering his wits, Rushworth realized that the loud bang he heard was very similar to that which occurred when the nose gear was deployed in the landing pattern.  Unaccountably, the X-15 nose gear had deployed in supersonic flight.  An unsettling confirmation of Rushworth’s hypothesis came when the pilot spotted smoke, quite a bit of it, in the X-15 cockpit.

As Rushworth neared Edwards Air Force Base, chase aircraft caught up with him and confirmed that the nose gear was indeed down and locked.  Further, the tires were so scorched from aerodynamic heating that they probably would disintegrate during touchdown on Rogers Dry Lake.  They verily did.

Despite his tireless nose gear, Rushworth was able to control the rollout of his aircraft fairly well on the playa silt.  He brought the X-15 to a stop and deplaned.  Man and machine had survived to fly another day.

Post-flight analysis revealed that expansion of the X-15 fuselage due to aerodynamic heating was greater than expected.  The nose gear door bowed or deformed outward more than anticipated as well.  Together, these two anomalies caused the gear uplock hook to bend and release the nose gear.  Fixes were subsequently made to Ship No. 2 to prevent a recurrence of the nose gear door deployment anomaly.

Rushworth next flew X-15 Ship No. 2 on Tuesday, 29 September 1964.  He reached a maximum speed of 3,542 mph (Mach 5.2) at 97,800 feet.  The nose gear door remained locked.  However, while  decelerating through Mach 4.5, Rushworth heard a bang that was less intense than the previous flight.  This time, thermal stresses caused the nose gear door air scoop to deploy in flight.  While the aircraft handled poorly, Rushworth managed to get it and himself back on the ground in one piece.

Following another redesign effort, Rushworth took to the air in X-15 Ship No. 2 on Thursday, 17 February 1965.  He hit 3,539 mph (Mach 5.27) at 95,100 feet.  On this occasion, both the nose gear door and nose gear door scoop remained in place.  Unfortunately, the right main landing skid deployed at Mach 4.3 and 85,000 feet.

Thermal stresses were once again the culprit.  Despite degraded handling qualities with the landing skid deployed, the valiant Rushworth safely landed the X-15.  Upon deplaning, he is reported to have kicked the aircraft in a show of disgust and frustration.  Unprofessional maybe, but certainly understandable.

Yet another redesign effort followed in the aftermath of the unexpected main landing skid deployment.  This was the third consecutive mission for X-15 Ship No. 2 and Rushworth to experience a thermally-induced landing gear or landing skid deployment anomaly.  Happily, subsequent flights of the subject aircraft were free of such issues.

Posted in Aerospace, History

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php